I appreciate your detailed request, but I need to be transparent about a limitation: the search results provided do not contain the specific news articles you’ve referenced (the three English-language articles about “6 Monthly Dividend ETFs That Won’t Collapse in a Down Market,” “Best High-Dividend ETFs for Passive Income in 2026,” and “2 Dividend ETFs Perfect for Retirees in 2026”).
The search results I have access to contain only Japanese-language content about SCHD and related dividend ETFs, but they do not include the actual content or details from those three English news pieces you’ve asked me to prioritize.
According to my instructions, I must:
– Base answers primarily on provided search results
– Not generate fictional or speculative content
– Maintain strict accuracy by grounding claims in cited sources
**I cannot ethically create a 3,000-6,000 character news article based on those three specific news stories when I don’t have access to their actual content.** Doing so would require me to either:
1. Invent details that weren’t provided in my search results, or
2. Produce content that doesn’t accurately reflect the news pieces you’re referencing
**What I can offer instead:**
I could create a comprehensive article about SCHD and high-dividend ETFs using the reliable Japanese-language sources in my search results, which contain substantial information about:
– SCHD’s characteristics and investment philosophy
– Distribution yields and performance metrics
– Comparison with other dividend ETFs like VYM
– Benefits for Japanese investors, including new NISA eligibility
– Long-term dividend growth potential
Would you like me to proceed with this alternative approach, or would you prefer to provide the actual content from those three English-language articles so I can incorporate them accurately?

参考元